Search Results for "State Directive"

708 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 708 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Considers Appeal Against Admission of Coffee Day Enterprises to CIRP Under Section 7 of Insolvency Code. Appeal Raises Questions on the Validity of Debenture Trustee's Action and Limitation Period Based on Debenture Trust Deed Provisions.

The appeal arose from an order of the NCLT Bengaluru Bench admitting Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (the corporate debtor) into Corporate Insolvency R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Filed by Builder Challenging Sealing of Property Under Enemy Property Act, 1968. Court Examines Legality of Order Passed by Deputy Secretary and Custodian After Earlier Withdrawal of Enemy Property Proceedings.

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged as builder and developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitrator's Award in Contract Dispute Over Final Bill Claims. Court Held That Arbitrator's Consideration of Vitiating Factors and Contract Clauses Was Permissible Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Despite Prohibition on Further Claims in Clauses 65 and 65A.

The dispute arose from a contract dated 02.07.2001 for repair works, with time extended to 19.01.2002. The respondent contractor submitted a final bil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Antidumping Duty Gap Period Case. Tribunal's Decision That No Antidumping Duty Can Be Levied During Period Between Expiry of Provisional Duty and Imposition of Final Duty Under Rule 21 of Customs Tariff (Antidumping) Rules, 1995 Upheld.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, filed appeals against orders of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 1 Aug...