Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

2583 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2583 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Warrant Against Education Officer in Execution Proceedings — State Officer Not Personally Liable for Decree Dues. Executing Court Cannot Direct Arrest or Recovery Against Government Officer Without Finding of Wilful Default Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC.

The case arises from execution proceedings of a decree passed by the School Tribunal, Pune, in Appeal No. 104 of 1998, directing the reinstatement of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Application of Section 157 Amendment in Land Reforms Dispute. Simultaneous Amendment of Section 157(1)(a) Read with Section 21(h) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951, Given Retrospective Effect to Avoid Frustrating Legislative Intent.

The dispute pertained to the status of Sukhram Singh and Laiq Singh as Adhivasis or Asamis under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Reference in Income Tax Case — Remands to Tribunal for Fresh Determination on Cessation of Liability Under Section 41(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Disputed Liability for Forest Produce Price Not Ceased Merely Because Assessee Did Not Pay Pending Adjudication.

The case involves an income tax reference by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to the Bombay High Court regarding the applicability of Section 41(1) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Award Denying Subsistence Allowance for Failure to Mark Attendance During Suspension. Suspended Employee Not Required to Attend Factory Daily for Subsistence Allowance Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Level Employees Union, challenged an Award dated 13.08.2014 which rejected a Reference concerning denial of subsistence...