Search Results for "1894"

1771 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1771 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 28-A Application for Enhanced Compensation Based on High Court's Appellate Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land owners covered by same notification can seek parity under Section 28-A even if reference court refused enhancement.

The petitioners, legal heirs of original land owners Shankarrao Pandoji Shendge and Bhagwan Pandoji Shendge, owned agricultural land in Mouza Ansing, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference Remand Due to Communication Gap Between Claimants and Counsel. Petitioners denied opportunity to lead evidence in LAR proceedings under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, warranting remand for fresh adjudication.

The petitioners, original claimants in a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenged the judgment and or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications in Favor of Landowner Due to Lapse Under Section 11-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Award Made Beyond Two-Year Period from Section 6 Declaration Invalidates Entire Acquisition Proceedings.

The petitioner, Mrs. Aienla Semelhago, challenged the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning the acquisiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. Collector Directed to Decide Afresh After Hearing Petitioners.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original landowner Mahadev Sadhu Ingale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under Works of Defence Act, 1903. Court Upholds Reference Court's Award Enhancing Compensation for Restrictions Imposed on Land Near Naval Armament Depot.

The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, imposed restrictions under Section 7(b) of the Works of Defence Act, 1903, on a property admeasuring 20,350 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon UAPA Case on Medical Grounds — Age and Health Conditions of 83-Year-Old Petitioner Considered. Court held that prolonged incarceration violates Article 21 right to life and health, granting bail under Section 439 CrPC and Section 43D(5) UAPA.

The petitioner, Dr. P. Varavara Rao, an 83-year-old poet and activist, was arrested in connection with the Bhima Koregaon case and charged under the U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Eviction Order Under Senior Citizens Act — Tribunal Cannot Order Eviction Under Section 5 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. Remedy of eviction is not provided under the Act; only maintenance and protection can be ordered.

The petitioners, son and daughter-in-law of respondents 2 and 3, challenged an order dated 21.01.2020 passed by the Tribunal constituted under Section...