Search Results for "same business"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "same business"

12245 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12245 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons Filed by Defendant for Return of Plaint in Suit for Damages Under Lease Agreement. Application Seeks Transfer to Chennai Court Citing Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause; Court Also Considers Limitation and Cause of Action.

20 Aug 2013

The matter pertained to a chamber summons filed by the defendant in a suit for damages. The defendant, Integrated Finance Co. Ltd., sought return of t...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NOS. 4564, 4565

1 Jan 1970

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MP Power Management Company, Upholds Termination of Power Purchase Agreement for Non-Compliance of Conditions Subsequent. The Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with a non-statutory contract and that the termination was justified as the seller failed to fulfill conditions within the extended period.

1 Jan 2022

The appellant, M.P. Power Management Company Limited, a wholly owned government company responsible for bulk purchase of electricity in Madhya Pradesh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

23 Dec 2015

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

22 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in NI Act Case: Director Can Be Prosecuted Without Company Being Arraigned as Accused if Complaint Contains Requisite Averments Under Section 141. The Court held that the absence of the company as an accused is not fatal and lack of specific averments can be cured, restoring the summoning order against the director.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the High Court of Allahabad's judgment quashing criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Diamond Bourse Suspension — Private Association's Internal Decisions Not Subject to Judicial Review. The court held that the Bharat Diamond Bourse, as a private company, had the right to regulate its membership and premises, and its actions were not amenable to writ jurisdiction or public law remedies.

16 Aug 2016

The plaintiffs, VSM Diamonds Pvt Ltd and three individuals, filed a suit against Bharat Diamond Bourse (BDB), a company incorporated under Section 25 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal and Sets Aside Tribunal's Award in Retrenchment Case – Managerial Decision to Reorganise Business and Retrench Employees Held Bona Fide; Tribunal Cannot Question Propriety. Retrenchment in Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F and West Bengal Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958 Rule 77(1); Error of Tribunal in Ignoring Bona Fide Nature of Decision Corrected via Certiorari.

27 Nov 1968

The dispute arose from the retrenchment of employees by Parry & Co. Ltd. following a policy decision to reorganise its business by emphasising manufac...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

65 66 67 68 69

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)