Search Results for "sale sanction"

1505 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1505 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Secured Creditor's Priority Over Sales Tax Dues in MVAT Act Attachment Dispute. State Bank of India's mortgage charge on borrower's property held superior to VAT recovery under Section 32 of MVAT Act, 2002, following Central Bank of India v. State of Kerala ratio.

The State Bank of India (SBI), a secured creditor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the attachment of a propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Limitation. The appellate court's dismissal of suit as barred by limitation was set aside as it failed to consider the plaintiff's case that refusal occurred on 30 March 1972, not 31 March 1972.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff (now represented by legal heirs) against the judgment of the District Court, Solapur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Subsequent Purchaser Cannot Challenge Land Acquisition After Preliminary Notification – Karnataka High Court | Arkavathi Layout Case

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order/report dated 23.02.2023 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Criminal Petition Under Section 482 CrPC Seeking Quashing of Private Complaint for Alleged Forgery and Cheating. The Petitioners, Accused Nos. 4 to 6, Alleged that the Complaint Was Civil in Nature and Filed After Unexplained Delay.

The petitioners, accused Nos. 4 to 6 in private complaint P.C.R.No.74 of 2022, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute, Sets Aside Injunction Against Dispossession. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Suit for Possession Based on Title Was Barred by Limitation.

The present First Appeal arises from a judgment of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in S.C. Suit No.5551/1990, where the suit was decreed in favor of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Pandurang Waghere, was a Talathi working in the revenue department. The complainant, Suhas Jagtap, held a Power of Attorney for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Trust Dispute for Non-Compliance with Section 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Suit by devotees challenging removal of deity held barred without Charity Commissioner's consent.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by defendant trustees (defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5) in a suit seeking rejection of the plaint under Order...