Search Results for "punitive order"

760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Assault, Where Death Occurred Four Days After Incident. Appeal Argues for Conviction Under Section 304 Part I IPC Based on Sudden Provocation and Lack of Intent.

The appeal arises from the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 08.02.2017 passed in S.C.No.85/2014 by the Principal Sessions Judge at Tumakuru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa confirmed conviction of Appellant in Sexual Assault Case Under IPC and Goa Children's Act Due to consistent Evidence and Corroboration

The Appellant was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Sections 341, 354, 375(b), and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaint in Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Cause of Action and Abuse of Process. Plaintiff failed to identify any protectable work or substantial similarity with defendant's film, leading to dismissal with costs.

The plaintiff, Akashaditya Harishchandra Lama, filed a suit for copyright infringement seeking an interim injunction to restrain the release of the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Contributory Negligence and Error in Income Calculation. Claimant's contributory negligence assessed at 30% and notional income reduced from Rs.12,000 to Rs.9,000 per month for a pillion rider with no proof of income.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of Supreeth S., a 24-year-old bachelor who died in a road acci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Tribunal's use of multiplier '13' for a 61-year-old claimant was contrary to Sarla Verma v. DTC guidelines; correct multiplier is '9'.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons Under Section 319 CrPC Against Advocate in Corruption Case — No Prima Facie Case for Summoning as Additional Accused

The petitioner, an advocate, was summoned as an additional accused in a corruption case pending before the LXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions C...