CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005
12 Apr 2013The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...
Search Results for "panchnama"
2559 result(s) found
Found 2559 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case; Dying Declaration Held Sufficient Despite Hostile Eye-Witnesses. The dying declaration of the deceased recorded by a revenue official after doctor's certification of consciousness was found reliable and formed the basis for conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
10 Apr 2013This criminal appeal arose from a murder case where the appellants, who are relatives of the deceased, were convicted and sentenced to life imprisonme...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC Due to Incomplete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Witness Testimony Was Inconsistent and Extra-Judicial Confessions Lacked Corroboration.
24 Aug 2005The case involved a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against the conviction of Nicholas alias Neckless alias Subhash Sunil Plada (A-2) und...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Reference for Confirmation of Death Sentence Under Section 366 CrPC and Criminal Appeal Against Conviction. The Trial Court Convicted the Accused Under Sections 302, 307, 323 Indian Penal Code and Awarded Death Sentence.
26 Jun 2012The matter came before the Bombay High Court as a confirmation reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and a criminal app...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based Solely on Dying Declaration After Eyewitnesses Turn Hostile. The Court Holds That a Dying Declaration Found Truthful and Voluntary Can Be Sole Basis for Conviction Under Section 302 Read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.
3 Aug 2011The appeal was preferred before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay against the judgment and order dated 30.12.2003 passed by the 3rd Adhoc Additio...
- 21
High Court
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2000
7 Mar 2011The appeal arose from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Beed, which convicted the appellant for offences under Sections 393/34, 324, and 353 of the ...
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 307 and 332 IPC Due to Lack of Evidence of Intention to Kill and Illegal Arrest. Conviction Under Section 135 Bombay Police Act Also Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Gupti Assault Caused by Blunt Side and Injury Was Simple.
7 Jan 2011In 1995, a police head constable, Mohammad Khan Pathan, and other police personnel from Itwara police station, Nanded, were ordered by Police Inspecto...
High Court
Bombay High Court Declares Arrest Illegal for Non-Compliance with Article 22(1) and Section 50 Cr.P.C. — Failure to Communicate Grounds of Arrest in Writing Renders Arrest and Subsequent Remand Void. The court held that the constitutional mandate under Article 22(1) requires grounds of arrest to be communicated in writing, and oral communication is insufficient, vitiating the arrest and all subsequent remand orders.
18 Jul 2024The petitioner was arrested on 22 February 2024 in connection with C.R. No.68 of 2020 registered at Malad Police Station for offences under Sections 4...
- 1818
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Based on Single Interested Witness and Hostile Witnesses Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC.
19 Apr 2024The case arises from a murder that occurred on 19th September 2001 in Babanagar village, Bijapur, Karnataka. The deceased, Malagounda, was the son of ...
- 720
High Court
Bombay High Court Commutes Death Penalty to Life Imprisonment in Multiple Murder Case — Land Dispute Led to Brutal Killing of Four Family Members, but Case Not 'Rarest of Rare'. The court upheld conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder of four persons but found mitigating circumstances outweighing aggravating factors, commuting death to life imprisonment.
13 Nov 2024The case arises from a brutal incident on 28 June 2015 where three accused, Haribhau Telgote (66), his wife Dwarkabai (55), and their son Shyam (35), ...
- 368
