Search Results for "minimum imprisonment"

768 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 768 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Allegations of fraud in counter-claim do not render it non-arbitrable unless serious and complex, under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves two arbitration petitions filed by Rekha Agarwal and Sunil Agarwal challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions, Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution of Firm Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves two arbitration petitions challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor - Seven-Year Sentence Affirmed. Consistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 363 and 376 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 363 and 376 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt the role of each accused in the fatal assault.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Sudhakar Pandurang Jagtap and others under Sections 302, 323, 504 read with 34 IPC for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 306 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bhagwan Chintaman Thakre, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376, 306, 342, 323, 504 and 506 read with Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Conviction under Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Yogesh Arjun Maral, was convicted by the Special Court under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Due to Lack of Sufficient Evidence. Claim for Samman Pension under Freedom Fighter Pension Scheme, 1972 rejected as petitioner failed to prove participation in Hyderabad Liberation Movement with credible documentary evidence.

The petitioner, Shri Ramkishan s/o. Narhari Sangewar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 4th August 2004 rejecting his claim for Samman...