Search Results for "certiorari jurisdiction"

1873 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1873 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging LIC's RFP for Registrar and Share Transfer Agent. Court holds that LIC's decision to prescribe minimum net worth of Rs. 300 crores in the RFP is a commercial decision and not arbitrary or discriminatory under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The Petitioner, Alankit Assignments Limited, a company engaged in the business of Registrar and Share Transfer Agent (RTA), filed a Writ Petition unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Case Due to 24-Year Delay in Adjudication. Inordinate delay in adjudication of show cause notice under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 renders it stale and liable to be quashed as abuse of process.

The petitioners, Rachana Garments Pvt. Ltd. and its director Dinesh Kumar Bhartiya, challenged a show cause notice dated 27 June 1997 issued by the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Trust in Writ Petition Concerning Educational Institution Management. Beneficiary of Trust Held Entitled to Be Heard Before Final Order Affecting Trust Property.

The case involves an Interim Application (L) No.1063 of 2021 filed by Rao Educational Trust seeking impleadment in a pending Writ Petition (L) No.2331...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Independent Application of Mind by AO. Reassessment based on borrowed satisfaction from investigation wing without forming own belief is invalid.

The petitioner, Skoda Auto Volkswagen India Private Limited, challenged a notice dated 23rd March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tahsildar's Demand for Royalty on Excavated Material During Construction. Held that Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty on material excavated pursuant to valid development permission under MRTP Act and NA permission under MLR Code.

The petitioner, originally Flagship Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and now Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging a show ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Material from Development Site. Tahsildar lacks jurisdiction to levy royalty under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 for excavation during construction pursuant to valid development permission.

The petitioner, Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd., a company engaged in real estate development, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Cour...