WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012
2 Apr 2013The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...
Search Results for "Trade Well"
3391 result(s) found
Found 3391 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Addresses Challenge to National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) Notifications for Medical Admissions. The court examines the regulatory power of medical councils and the impact on minority educational institutions under Articles 19(1)(g) and 30 of the Constitution.
1 Aug 2026The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of writ petitions and transferred cases challenging four notifications issued by the Medical Council of India...
- 101
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Public Interest Petition and Directs Expeditious Disposal of Section 14 SARFAESI Applications by Magistrates. Section 14 Powers Are Ministerial and No Notice to Borrower Is Required, Emphasizing Need to Recover Public Money Quickly.
20 Aug 2011The matter originated as a Criminal Writ Petition filed by International Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited, an asset reconstruction company...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Director’s Challenge to Arbitral Award in Factoring Facility Dispute — Upholds Award Despite Claims of Forged Guarantee and Procedural Lapses. Arbitral Tribunal’s Award Allowing SBI Global Factors’ Claim of Rs.43.45 Crores Jointly and Severally Against Guarantor and Principal Debtor Not Found Patent Illegality Under Section 34.
23 Dec 2025This judgment relates to a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Sanjeev Malhotra, a former director and sh...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicated Writ Petitions by Workmen Against Labour Court Awards in Industrial Disputes Act Matter — Labour Courts Had Answered References in Negative. Court Examined Section 2(oo)(bb) Exceptions and Reckoning of 240 Days Continuous Service in Context of Rotational Temporary Appointments.
1 Feb 2021The judgment under consideration arises from a group of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdicti...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.
1 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...
- 499
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Validity of HPCL Notifications Discontinuing and Revising Pension Benefits. The Court Examines Whether Employees Recruited Post-Acquisition and Retired Under ESSO/LIL Plans Are Entitled to Pension Protections Under ESSO Act, 1974 and Amalgamation Order.
3 May 2019The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the Pensioners Social & Welfare Association, a registered so...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Co-operative Spinning Mill to Operate Overdraft Account Despite RBI Restrictions on Co-operative Bank — Petitioner Held to be Operational Creditor Not at Par with Ordinary Depositors. The court held that RBI's blanket restrictions under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 were unreasonable as applied to an operational creditor with an excellent track record.
23 Mar 2023The petitioner, Babasaheb Naik Kapus Utpadak Sahakari Soot Girni, a registered co-operative spinning mill, filed a writ petition challenging the restr...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Passes Judgment on Interim Application and Contempt Petition Arising from Alleged Violation of Injunction in Trademark Suit. Petitioners Allege Wilful Disobedience of Order Restraining Use of 'Khadi' Mark and Association Name.
7 Aug 2026The dispute concerned an application under Order XXXIX, Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and a contempt petition arising from alleged wilf...
- 64
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 933
