Search Results for "Article 16(2)"

969 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 969 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Compassionate Appointment Case — No Right to Claim Higher Post After Accepting Lower Post. Appointment on compassionate basis is a concession to tide over sudden financial crisis; once accepted, cannot be renegotiated for a higher post.

The case involves eight appeals arising from a common judgment of the Madras High Court. The respondents, were initially appointed as sweepers on comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Caste Certificate Verification Order Under Maharashtra SC, ST, DNT, OBC Act, 2000. Services of Employee Claiming Dhangar Caste Not Protected Due to Invalid Caste Certificate and Government Resolution.

The petitioner, Harshalata Sudhakarrao Dhawale, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15th March 2013 passed by the Divisional Commissioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Jurisdictional Limits on State Interference in Land Rights: State of West Bengal v. Jai Hind Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No. 7407 of 2012

The case arose from a dispute involving land/tenancy rights and administrative interference by State authorities in West Bengal. The High Court had se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment Application in Partition Suit. Amendment Sought After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Due to Lack of Due Diligence.

The petitioners, Hemlata Harish Bhatia and Bharat Vallabhdas Bhatia, filed a suit for partition in 2004 against the respondents, Vallabhdas Lalchand D...