Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1102 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1102 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — No Error of Law or Jurisdiction Found. Court upholds award under Section 30 of Arbitration Act, 1940, holding that arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses and quantification of damages are not open to challenge unless perverse or beyond jurisdiction.

27 Jan 2005

The Appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, invited tenders for construction work and issued a work order to Respondent No.1, Atul Raj Bui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Partially Rejecting Amendment in Section 34 Petition Under Arbitration Act — Amendment Sought After Limitation Period Not Allowed as It Would Introduce New Grounds Beyond Scope of Section 34.

3 Jul 2021

The Appellant, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Time Limits for Awards Under Land Acquisition Laws in Appeal Against High Court Ruling on Lapse of Proceedings. The Court Examines Whether the Two-Year Period Under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Applies Post-Repeal or the Twelve-Month Period Under Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Governs Awards Under Section 24(1)(a).

10 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Gosikhurd Project. On 16th June 2011, a notification...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Condoning Delay in Arbitration Challenge. Limitation Period Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Held Absolute and Not Extendable Beyond 30 Days.

16 Dec 2021

The appellant, Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Ltd., had provided a loan to the respondent, Maheshbhai Tinabhai Rathod, for purchase of tract...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Appellants' Application Under Order 21 Rules 97, 98, 101 CPC Rejected by Executing Court Set Aside. Court Holds That Executing Court Must Determine Rights of Third Parties Claiming Independent Possession Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC Before Confirming Sale.

19 Sep 2022

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, who were the legal heirs of the original judgment-debtor, Hiranappa (since deceased), and other family...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute, Upholds Single Judge's Order Directing Joint Registrar to Decide Application on Merits. Frivolous and prolonged litigation erodes faith in justice delivery system.

28 Jun 2024

The appellant, Sri G. Krishnamurthy, had been involved in a long-standing dispute with the MICO Associates Housing Cooperative Society Ltd. The appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Advertising Agency Dispute — Retainer Fee Clause Interpreted as Monthly Payment Obligation. The court upheld the Arbitrator's finding that the Petitioner was liable to pay monthly retainer fees and fees during the notice period under the Company/Agency Agreement.

20 Jan 2014

The Petitioner, Maxx Moblink Pvt. Ltd., a company in the business of marketing and trading mobile phones, entered into a Company/Agency Agreement date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Broadcast Rights Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 4.77 Crore with Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

31 Aug 2012

The Petitioner, Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Maharashtra corporation, challenged an Arbitral Awar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Executing Court's Rejection of Execution Application for Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Does Not Require Separate Application Under Section 34 for Execution of Arbitral Award.

27 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited, obtained an arbitral award on 09.04.2014 directing the respondents to pay Rs. 74,094/- with...

65 66 67 68 69

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)