Search Results for "tribunal order set aside"

8869 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8869 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition; Revision Under Section 76 of BT & AL Act Maintainable Despite Prior Suo Motu Revision Under Section 76A. Full Bench Decision in Shireen Sami Gadiali (2011 (3) Mh.L.J. 486) Held Inapplicable as It Involved Section 154 of MCS Act, 1960, Not BT & AL Act.

The writ petition challenged an order of the President, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissing a tenancy revision application as not maintai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court disposes of criminal writ petition and appeal concerning illegal occupation of flats by petitioner and family. The court considers the legality of the FIR and the order of the Special MPID Court in the context of SARFAESI and MPID proceedings.

By this common judgment, the High Court disposed of Criminal Writ Petition No.2414 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.688 of 2006. The writ petitioner, In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Reviews Review Applications in Co-operative Sugar Mill Cases. No Substantive Judgment Text Available for Further Extraction.

No substantive judgment text provided; only case details are available. The case involves a batch of review applications by multiple individuals again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Notice Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Limitation Period Expired for Original Assessment Order. Reassessment Order Does Not Extend Limitation for Revising Original Assessment Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Ashoka Buildcon Ltd., challenged a notice dated 30 April 2009 issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nashik under Section 263 of ...