Search Results for "substantial implementation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1142 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1142 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging 47-Year-Delayed Gut Map Amendment Under Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. Power Under Section 31A Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time Despite Absence of Limitation; Amendment Creating New Road Held Not a Mere Clerical Correction.

6 Jul 2026

The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 August 2008 by the Superintendent of Land Records, Sangli, amending a Gut Ma...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

13 Jul 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers PIL on Infrastructure of Judiciary; Examines Primacy of High Court's Recommendations for Additional Courts. Court Notes State Government's Delays and Insistence That Its Own Views Prevail, Highlighting Need for 867 Additional Courts and Special Courts for Vulnerable Groups.

11 Oct 2018

This public interest litigation was instituted by a chartered accountant, Vihar Durve, raising concerns about the infrastructure of the judiciary in t...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes University's Rejection of PhD Thesis and Directs Re-Evaluation by a New Panel. Court Holds That University Failed to Follow Its Own Ordinance OB-9 in Evaluation Process, Resulting in Arbitrary Rejection of Candidate's Doctoral Work.

26 Sep 2017

The petitioner, a government servant holding two LLM degrees, registered for a PhD in Law at Goa University in July 2006 under the unamended Ordinance...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under POCSO Act – Hostile Witnesses and Child Evidence Analysed. Court Notes Violation of Section 33(5) POCSO in Recalling Child Witness.

25 Aug 2020

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a criminal appeal filed by the convicted appellant challenging the judgment of conviction dated M...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Criminal Complaint Under Factories Act; Occupier Contends Non-Joinder of Company and Lack of Order Viciate Proceedings Under Section 7A(2)(c) of the Factories Act, 1948.

6 Dec 2021

The petitioner, the occupier of M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in a PIL filed by a trade union of airport employees, pronounced an order on 14-09-2021, examining the legality of the privatisation of Mangaluru International Airport under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The court considered allegations that the concession agreement with Adani Enterprises Limited violated Sections 12, 12A, and 21 of the Act, and that the bidding process lacked transparency.

14 Sep 2021

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Airports Authority Employees Union, a registered trade ...

64 65 66 67 68

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)