Search Results for "section 13(4)"

1454 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1454 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Petition Challenged Interim Measures Granted by Arbitral Tribunal in Terminalling Service Agreement Dispute.

The petitioner, Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Co. Ltd., constructed port terminal facilities at Dahej, Gujarat, including tanks for handling and expo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Compensation in Land Acquisition References for MSRTC Bus Depot at Dahisar, Borivali. Comparable Land Sale Instances Analyzed to Fix Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

This matter involved a group of land acquisition references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by land owners whose properties ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Suit in Bona Fide Requirement Dispute. Appellate Court's Reversal Upheld as Landlord Failed to Prove Reasonable and Bona Fide Need for Suit Premises Under Section 13(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, Shiv Kumar I. Agarwal, through his constituted authority, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Advisory Board Opinion in COFEPOSA Detention Case — Advisory Board's Opinion of No Sufficient Cause for Detention is Non-Justiciable and Not Subject to Challenge Under Article 136

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India against the opinion of the Advisory Board constituted under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order in Company Law Dispute Over Share Transfer and Oppression. Court upholds CLB's refusal to dismiss petition under Section 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956, finding prima facie case of oppression and mismanagement.

The judgment arises from a company appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, by M/s. Gharda Chemicals Limited and others against an o...