Search Results for "sample result"

824 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 824 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was found untrustworthy and the recovery of weapon was not sufficiently corroborated.

The appellant, Hira Lohar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Bishnath Mehar. The prosecution case relied heavily on the sole testi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Registered Trademark 'SACU-V' for Heart Failure Drug Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'SACV' for Same Composition Pharmaceutical Product.

The Plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing and sale of pharmaceutical preparations. It adopted the trademark 'SACU-V' i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Long Incarceration and Lack of Trial Progress. Confessional Statement Under Section 67 NDPS Act Held Inadmissible, Right to Speedy Trial Prevails Over Section 37 Rigors.

The applicant, Kondiba Gunjal, Accused No.2 in a complaint filed by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) before the Special Court, sought bai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Murder of Four Family Members in Brutal Robbery-Murder Case. Court Upholds Conviction Under Sections 302, 392, 449, 460, 201 IPC for Killing Two Adults and Two Children in Their Flat.

The case arises from a brutal murder of four members of a family in their flat in Pune. The accused, Bhagwat Bajirao Kale, was a labourer working at a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...