Search Results for "notification bringing into force"

666 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 666 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses/Allows Petition Challenging MIDC's Allotment of Amenity Plots and Regulations 2009 – Judgment Truncated. Incomplete text prevents determination of outcome.

The petitioner, an industrial association of small scale industries, filed writ petitions challenging the allotment of open spaces or amenity plots wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dr. Smt. Usha Dhondiram Sarwade, a Casualty Medical Officer at Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, was convicted by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.3037 OF 2025

The writ petition challenged a show-cause notice dated 20 December 2023 issued by State Bank of India and the consequent order dated 13 June 2025 clas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SARFAESI Proceedings Against Company Under CIRP — Resolution Professional Entitled to Possession of Assets. Held that Section 14 of IBC overrides SARFAESI Act and other laws, and the moratorium under IBC bars any proceedings against the corporate debtor's assets.

The petitioner, M/s. Dreams Infra India Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Resolution Professional Sri Ashok Kriplani appointed by the National Company Law...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recount in Gram Pradhan Election Dispute Due to Vote Count Discrepancy. Discrepancy Between Oral Statement and Form 46 Justifies Recount Under Section 12-C(1) of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947.

The appeal arises from a Gram Pradhan election dispute in village Chaka @ Chak, Uttar Pradesh. The appellant, Vijay Bahadur, was the vanquished candid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference in Sales Tax Classification Case — PVC Pipes Not Agricultural Machinery. Assessee Entitled to Refund of Excess Tax Collected Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.

The case involves two sales tax references under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Patankar Broth...