Search Results for "negligent act"

2537 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2537 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes FIR in Rash Driving Case Based on Compromise Between Parties. Offences Under Sections 279, 338, 504 IPC Held to Be Non-Serious and Compoundable with Court's Permission, Allowing Quashing in the Interest of Justice.

The petitioner, Padmanabh Rawal, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A IPC Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses -- Conviction Overturned and Acquittal Restored

The appellant was convicted by the first appellate court under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for rash and negligen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Suit Dismissed for Default Due to Counsel's Negligence. Negligence of Advocate Constitutes Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 and Order 9 Rule 13 CPC.

The petitioners, legal representatives of Sardar Himmatbhai Khokar, filed a Regular Civil Suit No.794 of 2002 seeking cancellation of a sale deed date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Breach of Policy Conditions. The court applied the 'pay and recover' principle, holding that the insurer must compensate third party claimants and then recover from the insured.

The present appeal was filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Injured Tractor Owner in Motor Accident Case. The court increased the award from Rs.64,000 to Rs.1,00,000 under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the severity of injuries and medical expenses.

The appellant, Sanjay Sukhdeo Mankar, was the owner of a tractor bearing registration no. MH30E 7795. On 06/03/2001 at about 2:30 p.m., he was driving...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Enhanced for Death of Bachelor. Deduction of 1/3rd Towards Personal Expenses Held Erroneous; 50% Deduction Applied as Per Law.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, being the father, mother, widow, and children of Sheikh Ashiq, who died in a vehicular accident on 11.7.2004. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased Pedestrian Hit by Motorcycle. Court applies multiplier method and adds future prospects for self-employed professional aged 70 years under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, wife, son, and daughter of the deceased Ganapathy KGS Mani, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ...