Search Results for "minor children custody"

771 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 771 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case — Court Receiver Appointed to Protect Suit Premises Pending Trial. Dispute Involves Alleged Illegal Dispossession of Widow and Minor Son from Residential Flat and Office Premises by In-Laws.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by Khushnuma Ibrahim Khan and her minor son Raghib Ibrahim Khan (appellants) against Asadullah Khan and others (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vishal Ramesh Bhalerao, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 826 of 2012 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 452, 376AB, 506 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anand S/o Durgappa Gollar, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Belagavi in Special Case No.505/2023 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302/120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, was set aside as the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt with credible and corroborative evidence.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, which upheld the conviction of the appellants under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376D IPC and SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of three accused persons under Section 376D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 3(2)(v) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 5(n) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Eshwar, was convicted by the LIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Special C.C. No. 597/2014 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of POCSO Act set aside as testimonies of child victims were contradictory and unsupported by medical evidence.

The appellant, Navin Dhaniram Baraiye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case No. 218/2016 for offences under Se...