KAHC010521472015_1
4 Apr 2025The plaintiff, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in developing resorts and health clubs, entered into an agreement to purcha...
Search Results for "land title dispute"
3575 result(s) found
Found 3575 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Reservation for Public Garden in Kolhapur Development Plan. Reservation under Section 22 of MRTP Act, 1966 for public garden upheld as valid and not arbitrary, rejecting claims of delay and hardship.
13 Oct 2014The judgment concerns two connected matters: a writ petition filed by 15 members of the Jamsandekar family and a public interest litigation filed by P...
- 155
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit, Reinstating Decree for Redemption. Purchaser from Mortgagor Held Necessary Party in Foreclosure Suit Under Order XXXIV Rule 1 CPC, and Right to Redeem Not Extinguished by Decree Against Original Mortgagors Under Section 60 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
17 Aug 2021The dispute arose from a mortgage redemption suit involving land mortgaged in 1954. The plaintiff purchased the mortgaged land via registered sale dee...
- 497
High Court
High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Possession Dispute - Applicant Challenge to Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act Fails - Trial Court's Order Restoring Possession Upheld
27 Feb 2026The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application filed by the Applicant-Defendant challenging the Trial Court's decree in Special Civil Suit No...
- 645
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Injunction Based on Possession Despite Failure to Prove Ownership. Concurrent findings of fact on possession are binding in second appeal unless perverse; a plaintiff in possession can seek injunction against a trespasser under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
28 Jul 2017The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction filed by the respondents (original plainti...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition, Upholds Decision Denying Tenancy Declaration Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act, 1948. Commissioner's Order Recognizing Estate Holder as Occupant, Petitioners' Affidavits Admitting No Tenancy, and Dismissal of Civil Suit for Possession Falsified Tenancy Claim.
7 Oct 2023The dispute concerned a claim for tenancy over land bearing Survey No. 47, Hissa No. 2 in village Borivade, District Thane, originally part of the Sal...
- 22
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Dispute Over School Construction — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding possession and title of agricultural land cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.
3 Mar 2026The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) challenging the ju...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Writ Petition Challenging Reference Court's Order Framing Issue on Ownership in Land Acquisition Reference. The court held that the Reference Court has jurisdiction to frame an issue regarding ownership under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the writ petition against an interlocutory order was premature.
1 Oct 2015The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28/10/2014 passed by the Reference Court (Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panvel) in...
- 149
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Appellants Not Entitled to Higher Compensation as Claimants Failed to Prove Market Value. Reference Court's Award of Rs. 1,200 per sq.m. for acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld due to lack of reliable evidence for enhancement.
30 Nov -0001The case pertains to an appeal filed by the claimants (appellants) against the judgment of the Reference Court in land acquisition proceedings. The la...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.
10 Feb 2010The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...
- 86
