Search Results for "jurisdiction concession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "jurisdiction concession"

1126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1126 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Improvement Compensation Case — Constructive Res Judicata Not Applicable Due to Liberty Reserved by Earlier Order. The Court held that the claim for compensation under the Kerala Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1958 is not barred by constructive res judicata because the Supreme Court had expressly kept open the remedy in the earlier proceedings.

5 Feb 2019

The dispute concerns a large tract of land originally belonging to Vengunadu Kovilakam, leased out in 1897 for 75 years. After the lease expired in 19...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2019

15 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Despite Delay in Application. The court held that the limitation period under Section 49 should be liberally construed to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the petitioner's delay in applying for refund was condonable as the transactions never materialized.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Low Tax Effect and Lack of Substantial Question of Law. CBDT Circular No.17/2019 bars appeals where tax effect is below prescribed limit, and the court found no perversity in ITAT's order regarding Section 263 revision proceedings.

22 Jan 2021

The case involves an appeal by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in respect of the asse...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

10 Mar 2010

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Approve Dismissal in Gold Smuggling Case. Tribunal's Finding of Unfair Enquiry and Perverse Findings Upheld Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

11 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Air India Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22nd July 2004 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction Based on Plea Bargaining in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Practice of Plea Bargaining Deprecated by Supreme Court. Conviction under Section 33-EEC(c) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 set aside as it was based on plea bargaining, and matter remanded for fresh trial on merits.

16 Jan 2006

The applicants, R.K. Saksena and others, were convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Pimpri, Pune, in Criminal Case No. 3695/95 for an off...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Impounding Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — License Agreement for Telecom Infrastructure Not a 'Lease' Under Bombay Stamp Act. Agreement for installation of cellular mobile towers on rooftops held to be a license, not a lease, thus not liable to stamp duty as a lease.

29 Mar 2006

The petitioners, Bharti Telventures Limited and Sunil Bharti Mittal, were licensees under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, to set up and o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

64 65 66 67 68

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)