Search Results for "closing date"

949 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 949 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Panchayat Order for Demolition of Toilet Constructed on Common Well. Construction of Toilet and Septic Tank on a Common Well Without Permission Violates Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Public Health Norms.

The petitioner, Milagrina D'Mello, and the first respondent, John Gonsalves, are neighbours sharing a common well on the boundary of their properties....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shankar Pandurang Waghere, was a Talathi working in the revenue department. The complainant, Suhas Jagtap, held a Power of Attorney for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate Based on Caste. Alleged Abusive Words Not Uttered in Public View and Absence of Caste-Based Insults Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The applicant, Avakash Ingole, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.109/2021 reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Proceedings and Contradictory Witness Testimony. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 8 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sri. Manjanna M.K., a Head Constable at Bagalagunte Police Station, was convicted by the XXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves multiple criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...