Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"

1965 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1965 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Substitution of Arbitrator in Sports Contract Disputes Under Sections 11 and 15(2) of Arbitration Act. Arbitrator's failure to render award within statutory period and subsequent resignation justified substitution despite respondent's objection.

The judgment concerns a group of arbitration applications filed under Section 11 and Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Exclusion of Counterclaim for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit for Specific Performance.

The applicant, Sainath Jadhav, filed Regular Civil Suit No.731 of 2007 for injunction against the respondent, Shankar Jadhav, regarding agricultural l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner Who Did Not Participate in Tender Cannot Challenge Its Award Without Showing Public Interest or Mala Fides.

The petitioner, K.P. Ibrahim, filed a writ petition challenging the award of a tender by the Public Works Department, Government of Goa, for a constru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Under Section 193 IPC Against Accused in False Statement Case — Statements Made in Departmental Enquiry Not Before Court of Law. Section 193 IPC Requires False Evidence in Judicial Proceedings; Statements Before Departmental Enquiry Do Not Attract Offence.

The petitioner, Appasaheb Baburao Shinde, was the original accused No.4 in a complaint filed by respondent No.2, Sachin Mahadeo Vaidya, before the Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears SEBI's Application to Recall Sanction of Composite Scheme in Fertilizers Merger Case. Securities Regulator Alleges Material Non-Disclosure and Accounting Violations in Scheme Involving Listed and Unlisted Companies Under Companies Act, 1956.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed applications on 21.02.2013 seeking recall of orders of the Bombay High Court dated 17.06.2011 ...