Search Results for "Reply Statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7012 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7012 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Application Against Respondent for Willful Breach of Injunction Order in Trademark Infringement Suit. Use of 'NOVA MINI' mark and similar artistic work held to be deceptively similar to registered trademark 'NOVA' and artistic work, constituting contempt under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC.

13 Jul 2026

The applicant, Dr. Ashok M. Bhat, is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'NOVA' and an artistic work used for brilliantine hair cream. In 2007,...

High Court

Division Bench of Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Single Judge Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit. Ex-Parte Decree Passed in Diamond Supply Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC After Defendants Failed to Comply with Conditional Deposit Order.

27 Feb 2017

The dispute arose from a summary suit filed by Sailam BVBA, a Belgian partnership firm, against Helios Jewellery Pvt Ltd (Defendant No.1) and its four...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.

10 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Gap of Nearly One Year Between Issuance and Execution Without Reconsideration of Changed Circumstances. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Detenu Was in Judicial Custody at Time of Execution, Though on Bail When Order Was Issued.

5 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Shri Raja @ Rajesh Rajan Nair, challenged his detention order dated 30th September 2003 issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding — Upholds Tribunal's Order Based on Sufficiency of Evidence and Natural Justice. The court held that the findings of the enquiry officer were not perverse and the Tribunal's order did not warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

20 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Hanumanprasad Durgaprasad Mishra, was appointed as a Junior Clerk on a purely temporary basis on 22 July 1981 and posted at the Govern...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Impleadment of Parties in Property Dispute — Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Trial Allowed as No Prejudice Caused. Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits liberal amendment before trial; impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC allowed for complete adjudication.

1 Aug 2014

The plaintiffs, Sharayu Ramkrishna Mhatre and Anjali Deepak Karnik, filed a suit (Suit No. 1964 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Land Executed in 1975, Suit Filed in 1985, Dismissed as Time-Barred and for Failure to Prove Continuous Readiness.

4 Mar 2016

The respondent no.1/plaintiff, a cooperative housing society, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of land dated 30.1.1975, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in BSNL Dues Dispute — Lack of Consent Invalidates Compromise. Permanent Lok Adalat Cannot Pass Award Without Parties' Consent Under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

14 Feb 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Mac Charles (I) Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had subscribed to telephone lines from the respondent, B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in BSNL Dues Dispute — Lack of Consent Invalidates Compromise. Permanent Lok Adalat exceeded jurisdiction by adjudicating without consent of parties under Section 22C of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

14 Feb 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Mac Charles (I) Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, had subscribed to telephone lines from the respondent, B...

64 65 66 67 68

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)