Search Results for "Income Tax recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Income Tax recovery"

1031 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1031 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Monarch Research and Brokerage Private Limited and Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited with Networth Stock Broking Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 — Objection by Gold Castle Realtor Dismissed as Not a Creditor or Member.

7 Aug 2014

The judgment concerns two Company Scheme Petitions (CSP 575/2012 and CSP 576/2012) filed by Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited (2nd Transferor Com...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

7 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Orders on Company's Petition to Quash Criminal Case for Alleged Cheating of Rs 36 Crores. Commercial Property Transaction Dispute Resulted in FIR; Petitioners Claim Abuse of Process Amid Pending Civil and Insolvency Proceedings.

6 Aug 2024

The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by Patel Engineering Limited an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in Customs Smuggling Conspiracy Case — Statements Under Section 171-A of Sea Customs Act Held Admissible as Customs Officer is Not a Court. Office Copy of Insurance Premium Debit Note Admissible Under Section 114 Evidence Act and Appraiser's Valuation Evidence Not Hearsay, Convictions Upheld.

13 Aug 1969

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against convictions by the Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, as affirmed by the Bombay High Court, for conspirac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Challenging Waqf Board Notice on Land Exchange — Exchange of Waqf Property Allegedly Without Required Sanction Under Section 32(2)(j) of Waqf Act, 1995. Court Examines Whether Notice Was Final Decision or Show-Cause, and Whether Exchange Valid Despite Internal Board Procedural Issues.

9 Oct 2017

The petitioners, a partnership firm and its partner, challenged a notice issued by the Chief Executive Officer of the Maharashtra State Board of Waqfs...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Land Authority Challenging Auction Sale of Nazul Land Due to Delay and Laches. Lease Agreement Did Not Confer Title Without Execution of Lease Deed, but Long Lapse of Time Prevents Challenge.

7 Mar 2025

The appellant, Delhi Development Authority (DDA), executed an agreement of lease dated 17th July 1957 in respect of plot no.3 in favour of M/s Mehta C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Orders Declaring Abatement and Rejecting Substitution in Second Appeal. Non-Substitution of Legal Heir of Co-Appellant Results in Whole Appeal Abating Where Decree is Joint and Indivisible, and Delay Condonation Denied as No Sufficient Cause Shown Under Order XXII CPC and Limitation Act.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a civil suit for declaration, recovery of possession, and mesne profits regarding a house. The plaintiff claimed exclusive titl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

7 Jul 2022

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Readiness and Willingness Not Proved Despite Loan Approval.

17 Sep 2019

The appellant, Ritu Saxena, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement dated July 18, 2004, for the purchase of a flat in New Delhi for Rs....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

64 65 66 67 68

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)