Search Results for "FIR Error"

2043 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2043 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MCOCA Prosecution for Invalid Sanction — Lack of Application of Mind by Sanctioning Authority. Sanction under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 must reflect due consideration of material; mechanical grant vitiates prosecution.

The Bombay High Court disposed of four criminal writ petitions filed by Pradip Madgaonkar @ Bandya Mama, Vinod G. Asrani, and Jayant Rajaram Mule, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Case for Non-Compliance with Section 37 Twin Conditions. High Court's observation that rigours of Section 37 can be diluted by right to speedy trial held contrary to settled law.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Punjab against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court granting regular bail to R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and Robbery Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Victim and Witnesses Found Unreliable, Medical and Forensic Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of acquittal dated 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's award of Rs.20,13,893 set aside; compensation recalculated at Rs.4,83,893 with 7.5% interest for death of 56-year-old private employee.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of deceased Mohansinh Narsinh Sapa, who died in a road accident on 26.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — 10% Contributory Negligence Set Aside and Compensation Enhanced. Rear-end collision by truck held solely negligent; multiplier of 17 applied with 40% future prospects for self-employed deceased aged 30.

The present appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 01.12.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad in MACP No.1145 of 2005...