Search Results for "Central Government exclusive jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Central Government exclusive jurisdiction"

1022 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1022 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Dismissal of Specific Performance Suit Arising from Joint Development MOU; Developer Seeks Amendment to Include Refund Claim After Dismissal of Suit.

8 Jul 2026

The appeal arose from a commercial suit for specific performance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 27.09.2004. The appellant, M/s Whitefiel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Construction in Powai and Tirandaz — No Breach of Tripartite Agreement or ULC Act Exemption Found. The court held that the construction was in accordance with sanctioned plans and permissions, and the challenge to the exemption order was barred by delay and laches.

22 Feb 2012

The judgment concerns three Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed by Kamlakar Motiram Satve, Rajendra Thacker, and Medha Patkar challenging the con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Court's Order Granting Temporary Injunction in Tenant Dispute. District Judge's Power to Reappreciate Evidence in Injunction Appeals Upheld Under Order 39 CPC.

12 Oct 2018

The petitioners, Abidbhai and Musabhai, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 17th January 2014 passed by the District Judge,...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Challenging Irrigation Restoration Charges — Rate and Area of IRC Disputed; Petitioner Alleges Discrimination and Exorbitant Demand. Issue of whether IRC should be calculated at Rs. 50,000 per hectare as per report dated 11.01.2008 instead of Rs. 1 lakh per hectare under Government Resolution dated 06.03.2009.

5 May 2016

The petitioner, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and engaged in power generation, challenged the demand for Irrigatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Service Tax on Onsite Work at Customer's Premises Under Export of Service Rules, 2005. The court held that onsite work at customer's premises abroad qualifies as 'Service Provided from India' under Rule 3(2)(a) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, and the appellants are entitled to refund of service tax paid.

15 Sep 2014

The case involves appeals by Tech Mahindra Limited and other assessees against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CE...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Transfer of Arbitration Application to Commercial Court Under Section 15 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The Court held that the District Court has jurisdiction to transfer a pending arbitration application to the Commercial Court if the subject matter is a commercial dispute, regardless of when the application was filed.

5 Apr 2018

The petitioner, M/s D.M. Corporation Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 Nov...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Determines Applicability of Maharashtra Fee Regulation Act to Autonomous Professional Colleges. The Court Examined Whether Autonomous Status Under the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 Exempts Institutions from Fee Oversight by the Fees Regulating Authority.

25 Jan 2018

The judgment addressed a common question of law arising from three writ petitions filed by autonomous educational institutions: K.J. Somaiya College o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Winding Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956 – Default in Repayment of Secured Facilities Allegedly Renders Respondent Unable to Pay Debts. Petitioner Bank Seeks Winding Up and Appointment of Provisional Liquidator After Respondent Defaults on Short-Term Loan and Letters of Credit.

14 Feb 2017

The case concerned a company petition for winding up under the Companies Act, 1956, instituted by IDFC Bank Limited, a creditor, against M/s.Ruchi Soy...

64 65 66 67 68

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)