KAHC010220972024_1
20 Jul 2026These commercial appeals under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2...
Search Results for "section 23(3)"
890 result(s) found
Found 890 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines PIL for Heritage Conservation — Government's Omission of Buildings from Heritage List Without Consultation and Reasons Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Challenged. Petitioner Society Asserts That Statutory Procedure Was Not Followed and Heritage Conservation Committee's Recommendations Were Ignored.
5 May 2006The Vidarbha Heritage Society, a registered society formed in 1997, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking ...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Union's Petition Challenging Government's Refusal to Refer Industrial Dispute Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Appropriate Government Exceeded Its Power by Delving into Merits and Considering Irrelevant Factors Such as Acceptance of Retrenchment Compensation by Some Workmen.
27 Jan 2020The petitioner, United Mine Workers Union, challenged the communication dated 3rd September 2019 issued by the Union of India (Ministry of Labour and ...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.
15 Dec 2020The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal in Revenue Recovery Dispute Against Company in Liquidation. Priority of secured creditor's claim under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 upheld over State's statutory dues under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.
18 Sep 2025The case involves an appeal by the State of Karnataka and its officers against an order of the Company Judge dated 03.11.1998 in Company Application N...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Council in Workmen's Compensation Case — Construction of Shopping Complex Held Part of Principal Employer's Business Under Section 2(2) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Municipal Council Liable Jointly and Severally with Contractor for Compensation to Injured Workman.
23 Jan 2014The case arises from a claim for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by Manoj Achyut Bhosle (respondent No.1), a labourer e...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Husband's Revision Against Enhanced Maintenance Under Section 127 Cr.P.C. — Enhancement Set Aside Due to Lack of Material Change in Circumstances. The court held that Section 127 Cr.P.C. requires proof of material change in circumstances for enhancement, and the Family Court's order without such evidence was perverse.
24 Apr 2026The case involves a revision petition filed by the husband, Sri. Ravi, under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the order dated...
- 293
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and Robbery Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Victim and Witnesses Found Unreliable, Medical and Forensic Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.
31 Oct 2022The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment of acquittal dated 18...
- 137
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and SC/ST Act Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Unreliable and Contradictory, Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape Allegation.
3 Nov 2022The State of Karnataka, through the Assistant Superintendent of Police, Puttur, appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 08.10.2015 passed by ...
- 204
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over HAMON Mark. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'HAMON' found to be infringed by Defendant's use of 'HAMON COOLING' and 'HCS HAMON COOLING' in trade and corporate name.
6 Jul 2026The Plaintiff, John Cockerill Hamon SA, filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging infringement and passing off of its registered trademark 'HAMON' by the De...
- 24
