Search Results for "revision under Article 227"

1353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Executability of Decree on Ground of Non-Compliance with Order XX Rule 4 CPC. Judgment Debtor Cannot Raise Nullity of Decree Under Section 47 CPC After Ex-Parte Decree Became Final and Earlier Application to Set Aside Was Dismissed.

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by Srinivasa Doss (petitioner) against P.Kalaidasan and P.Seshian (respondents) challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Lack of Jurisdictional Satisfaction and Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Commissioner's order set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration after hearing parties.

The petitioner, Shri Rukmanna S/o Shankar Zunjwadkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Petition Challenging Mandatory Injunction in Favour of Flat Purchasers. Co-operative Housing Society Cannot Deny Membership to Purchasers from Developer Without Following Bye-Laws and Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Royal Manor Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Cooperative Bank's Recovery Officer Against Auction Sale of Property. Sale by cooperative bank under MCS Act is not a sale under Transfer of Property Act, and recovery officer is not a court or tribunal under Limitation Act.

The petitioner, the Special Recovery Officer/Sales Officer of Dr. Annasaheb Chougule Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...