Search Results for "excess work"

1474 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1474 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds single judge's refusal to set aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to challenge.

The Union of India (appellant) had invited tenders for construction work, and Moti Enterprises (respondent) was the successful tenderer. The contract ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Stay on Transfer Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Transfer of Workmen During Pendency of Industrial Disputes Constitutes Prima Facie Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an interim order dated 23rd December 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Single Judge's Order Partially Setting Aside Arbitral Award. The Court affirmed reduction of interest rate from 18% to 12% per annum and setting aside of claim nos. (d) and (g) and interest on security deposit.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) against a judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes State Government's Cancellation of Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approvals and Directs Fresh Hearing. Inconsistencies Between Government Directives and SRA Circular Were Not Established, and Scheme Was Permitted Under New Housing Policy of 2007.

The petitioner, a developer, submitted a proposal for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme which was in the nature of a Township Development Scheme for approx...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petitions Against Royalty Demands for Excavation During Building Construction Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Petitioners Argue Excavation Incidental to Permitted Construction Does Not Constitute Mining.

The Bombay High Court heard four writ petitions challenging the demand of royalty and penalty by revenue authorities for excavation carried out during...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Circular Restricting Land Compensation Under Consent Award. Circular dated 27.02.2020 Held Ultra Vires the RFCTLARR Act, 2013 and Maharashtra Rules, 2014.

The petitioner, Sanjay Mahadeo Japkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Circular...