Search Results for "customs adjudication"

707 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 707 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit for Cotton Price and Interest — Contract Deemed Accepted Under Clause 33. The court held that the defendant was liable to pay the price of cotton bales and other charges with interest at 20% per annum.

The plaintiff, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs.15,78,006.49 along with interest at 20% per annum against the def...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Wage Parity Claim by Non-Technical Officers of MSEB. Non-technical officers cannot claim parity with technical officers as they form separate classes under the Electricity Supply Act, 1948.

The petitioners, M.S.E.B. Officers' Association and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking wage parity for non-te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Quashes Sanction Order in Disproportionate Assets Case Against IRS Officer — Sanctioning Authority Failed to Apply Independent Mind and Relied on CBI Report Without Proper Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Vivek Batra, an Indian Revenue Service officer, challenged the sanction order dated 09.10.2012 granted by the Union of India for his p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Validation Act in Import Fee Dispute. Parliament Competent to Enact Retrospective Validation to Cure Defect in Subordinate Legislation, Even if It Affects Pending Litigation.

The petitioners, M/s R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd. and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of the Destructive Insects and Pests ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that arbitrators are not bound to give reasons for each item of claim and that the award is not liable to be set aside for non-speaking nature under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appellant, Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a contract dated 12/10/1985...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Intermediate Product Marketability. Court holds that CESTAT failed to consider relevant evidence regarding marketability of loosely assembled fibre web used captively for manufacture of exempted jute carpets.

The appellant, M/s Hitkari Hitech Fibres Pvt. Ltd., is a manufacturer of products under Chapters 56 and 57 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...