Bombay High Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to Service Tax on Advocates. The Levy Under Section 65(105)(zzzzm) of the Finance Act, 1994 is Challenged as Ultra Vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 265 of the Constitution.
15 Dec 2014...
Search Results for "consumer complaint"
733 result(s) found
Found 733 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Polluter Pays Principle in Tannery Pollution Case — Directs Comprehensive Compensation and Remediation for Environmental Degradation in Vellore District. The court affirmed that tanneries are strictly liable for ecological damage and health impacts, and the Loss of Ecology Authority's compensation assessment must be enforced with government backup liability.
13 Feb 2025The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment addressing the severe environmental degradation caused by tannery industries in Vellore Distr...
- 1356
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in Economic Offence Case Due to Non-Completion of Investigation Within 60 Days. Indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. accrued as charge-sheet not filed within statutory period.
18 Oct 2023The applicants, Kashinath Pandurang Jadhav, Parth Kashinath Jadhav, and Vikas Kishan Gaikwad, were arrested on 5 July 2023 in connection with FIR No. ...
- 144
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Disqualification of Municipal Corporator for Illegal Construction and Encroachment. Disqualification under Section 10(1D) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 upheld based on findings of unauthorized construction and encroachment by the elected member.
23 Mar 2021The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by Mrs. Tilottama Sanjay Kinkhede (WP 5075/2019) and Mrs. Pragati Ajay Patil (WP 6236/2019) concerni...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 12, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
23 Oct 2020The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Avinash Sadashiv Khristi and Arun Shivaji Chavan, who were accused of offences under the Pr...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking to Unilaterally Implement Notice of Change Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer Cannot Implement Proposed Changes Without Settlement or Award from Competent Court.
31 Mar 2012The petitioner, J. D. Orgochem Limited (formerly Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd.), is a company engaged in manufacturing chemicals. The respondent, Dyes and Che...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Criminal Revision Against Process Issuance — Petitioner Pursued Wrong Remedy Under Section 227 CrPC. The court held that pursuing a wrong remedy constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, and the revision should be heard on merits.
3 Nov 2025The petitioner, Ankit Padhye, challenged an order dated 17.07.2025 passed by the Special Court for Differently-able Persons, Senior Citizens and Margi...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Imposed on Public Sector Oil Company for Alleged Legal Metrology Violation — Lack of Mens Rea and Procedural Irregularities. Show Cause Notice Must Specify Exact Violation Under Section 50 of Legal Metrology Act, 2009.
31 Jan 2014The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, a public sector oil company, challenged an order dated 4/9/2013 passed by the Secretary, Legal Metrolo...
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Criminal Revision Against Process Issuance — Petitioner Pursued Wrong Remedy of Discharge Application Under Section 227 CrPC. Pursuing a wrong remedy constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act read with Section 528 BNSS.
3 Nov 2025The petitioner, Ankit Padhye, challenged an order dated 17.07.2025 passed by the Special Court for Differently-able Persons, Senior Citizens and Margi...
- 195
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Tribunal's Failure to Consider Evidence — Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court held that under Section 163A, the claimant need not prove negligence, and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim on the ground that the offending vehicle was not identified.
12 Jan 2026The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, being the wife, major children, and parents of the deceased Shantilal Kalabhai Garasia, a Poli...
- 184
