WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012
2 Apr 2013The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...
Search Results for "Village Development Committee"
1126 result(s) found
Found 1126 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Acquisition Notification for Petitioners' Land Due to Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Notification held invalid for failing to specify the particular land and for not providing opportunity of hearing before declaration of slum area.
13 Apr 2023The petitioners, Yogesh Chandulal Mehta and Suresh Chandulal Mehta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The acquisition was declared lapsed due to non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession, despite pending proceedings under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.
22 Mar 2022The dispute arose from land acquisitions by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Bangalore, for establishing a mega market, involving multipl...
- 413
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Juvenile Justice Age Determination Case Due to Unreliable Documents. The Court upheld the High Court's order setting aside juvenile status, finding birth certificate and school leaving certificate procured and unreliable under Rule 12(3)(b) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2007 and Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969.
15 Feb 2022The appeal challenged an order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 30.07.2019, which set aside an order declaring the appellant a juvenile i...
- 331
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment of Arogya Sevak from OBC and Project Affected Category. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for appointment from OBC and Project Affected Category in accordance with law.
19 Oct 2015The petitioner, Manisha Namdevrao Chole, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider her claim for appointment to t...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
2 Mar 2016The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.
2 Mar 2016The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...
- 137
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Section 13(1) 120-Day Period Not Mandatory for Owner's Proposal. Owner's Preferential Right to Develop Slum Land Not Extinguished by Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.
26 Aug 2024The case involves a challenge to an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) dated 17th February, 2023, which rejected a redevelopment p...
- 921
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Purchaser in Scheduled Caste Land Transfer Dispute — Migrant Scheduled Caste Status Cannot Be Claimed in Another State for Land Transactions Under Rajasthan Tenancy Act and Colonization Act. The Court held that a person recognized as Scheduled Caste in Punjab cannot claim the same status in Rajasthan for purchasing land from a Scheduled Caste allottee, and compounding under Section 13A does not validate the void transfer.
20 Oct 2021The dispute pertains to agricultural land in Rajasthan originally allotted to Chunilal, a Scheduled Caste person. In 1972, Chunilal borrowed Rs.5000 f...
- 701
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Involving Scheduled Caste Status and Statutory Violations. The court held that Scheduled Caste status is state-specific under the Constitution and cannot be claimed by a migrant in another state, and the land transaction was void as it violated Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 and Section 13 of the Rajasthan Colonization Act, 1954.
5 Jan 2022The dispute centered on land in Rajasthan originally allotted to Chunilal, a Scheduled Caste person, who allegedly borrowed money from Puran Singh, a ...
- 674
