Search Results for "Undue Influence"

899 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 899 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Against Supervisor in Sexual Harassment Case Under Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 — Natural Justice Not Violated as Inquiry Committee Followed Due Process and Findings Were Not Perverse.

The petitioner, Milind Mamlekar, a supervisor in the Estate Section of Goa University, challenged the penalty imposed on him following a complaint of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Sudden Quarrel Case. Appellant Acquitted of Attempt to Murder Due to Unreliable Evidence.

The appellant, Janardan @ Shankar Tukaram Baing, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2011 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Ashok Dhondiram Dhavale, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag for the murder of Leelabai and her daughter Manisha under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit — Emphasizes Need for Brevity in Pleadings. The court allowed the defendants to defend the suit on condition of depositing a portion of the claimed amount, while deprecating prolix pleadings.

The applicant, JSW Steel Ltd., filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against M/s. Paras Das Jain and Sons and two ...