Search Results for "Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Act"

729 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 729 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Housing Board Dispute — Unauthorized Construction Not Ipso Facto Nuisance but Concurrent Findings Upheld. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Despite Section 71 Bar of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 as Suit Pertains to Private Rights.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant No.1, Sau. Smita Mohod, against concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Civil Application in PIL Challenging Order to Destroy Tigress Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Permission to Hunt Man-Eater Tigress Upheld as Chief Wildlife Warden’s Satisfaction Was Based on Relevant Material Without Overstepping Statutory Powers.

The petitioner, Dr. Jerryl Avinash Banait, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging an order dated 9.10.2017 passed by the Chief Wildlife ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Accommodation in Redevelopment Project Under Section 33(15) of D.C. Rules, 1991. Petitioners, occupants of Tarabai Chawl, entitled to possession in property redeveloped by Sanjivani Developers.

The petitioners, eight individuals occupying rooms in Tarabai Chawl, Dadar, Mumbai, filed a writ petition seeking accommodation in a redevelopment pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Land Acquisition Map Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Upheld. The court held that a suit challenging a land acquisition map is not barred by Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as the map is not an award.

The petitioner, original defendant No.7, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Not Vitiated for Failure to Serve Notice on Unrecorded Purchaser. Civil Suit Challenging Acquisition Award Held Not Maintainable Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to a second appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the lower appellate court which had decreed the suit in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...