Search Results for "Kerala Act"

3976 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3976 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Sugar Factories and Distilleries Against State of Maharashtra Regarding Excise Transport Fees. Petitioners Challenged Validity of Transport Fee Demands Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The Bombay High Court, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a batch of fifty-one writ petitions filed by various sugar factori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.

The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in Trademark Suit, Holding Section 134(2) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Confers Additional Forum. Plaintiff Allowed to Sue Where It Carries on Business Even If Cause of Action Arose Elsewhere.

The case arose out of a suit for perpetual injunction filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited (plaintiff) against Ashique Chemicals and others (defendants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Communidade of Colvale v. Benjamin Pereira & Anr. Tenancy Rights Not Established by Mere Revenue Entries or Rent Receipts; Deemed Purchase Under Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act Requires Proof of Actual Cultivation.

The appellant, Communidade of Colvale, owned survey no. 220/1. Two notifications under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, acquired 1,09,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Refund of TDS Under Section 244A of Income Tax Act — Mandamus Issued for Payment of Interest on Delayed Refund. CBDT Communication Denying Interest Held Contrary to Statutory Provisions and Quashed.

The petitioner, M/s. Sunflag Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in steel manufacturing, entered into an agreement with a German c...