Search Results for "Finance Act 1956"

1253 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1253 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Correctly Held Commissioner Not Justified Under Section 263 for Alleged Double Deduction of Excise Duty. Assessing Officer Followed Permissible View and Assessee Did Not Claim Deduction Twice.

The present appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Passes Judgment in Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Whether a Cheque Issued as Security Attracts Liability Under Section 138 Remains the Central Question.

The appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant, Goa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Guarantee Enforcement Case. Personal Guarantors Held Liable Despite Principal Borrower's Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Section 14 of IBC.

The petitioners, Jamboo Kumar Jain and Praful Kumar Jain, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...