Search Results for "Expeditious Disposal"

836 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 836 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court Order Striking Out Defence for Non-Compliance with Conditional Order Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC. Failure to Pay Costs and File Written Statement Within Extended Time Leads to Automatic Striking Out of Defence.

The petitioners, Mr. Venugopal Krishnamurthy and Mrs. Poorna Venugopal, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings in NI Act Complaint for Non-Compliance with BNSS Section 223 Procedure. Mandatory hearing of accused at cognizance stage under first proviso to Section 223 BNSS applies to complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Ashok S/o Siddappa Bankar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (corresponding to Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Anganwadi Helper's Petition for Appointment as Sevika — No Right to Regularisation Under Government Resolution. Petitioner failed to establish eligibility under GR dated 12.3.2008 as she was not a candidate sponsored by the Employment Exchange.

The petitioner, Sau. Vidya Vishnu Vanare, filed a writ petition seeking implementation of Government Resolution dated 12.3.2008 for her appointment as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Amend Plaint After 14 Years. Amendment Sought to Introduce New Case of Fraud and Collusion Rejected as Barred by Limitation and Laches.

The appeal arose from a suit for partition and declaration filed by the appellant, Minakshi Mahendra Pitroda, against the respondents. The suit proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Appeal in POTA Case for Mulund Bomb Blast Accused. Appellant's claim of illegal detention and fresh evidence under RTI did not warrant bail due to serious allegations and lack of changed circumstances.

The appellant, Adnan Bilal Mulla, was accused no.15 in POTA Special Case No. 2 of 2003, arising from three bomb blasts in Mumbai Central (6/12/2003), ...