Search Results for "Effective Communication"

1643 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1643 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Education Officer's Order Setting Aside Transfer of Headmaster — Transfer of Headmaster Held Not Requiring Prior Approval Under Section 5 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The case involves two writ petitions. The first petition was filed by Janta Shikshan Sanstha and its office bearers challenging the order of the Educa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes HAL Circular Re-fixing Pay Notionally from 2017 — Violation of Natural Justice and Article 14. Employer's Unilateral Re-fixation of Pay Without Hearing Employees Held Arbitrary and Unenforceable.

The petitioner, Hindustan Aeronautics Officers Guild (HAOG), representing officers of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), filed a writ petition under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 56 OF 2013

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Contractual interpretation of service tax liability under security services contract upheld by arbitrator.

The petitioner, Bombay Intelligence Security (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher in Voluntary Retirement Case. Acceptance of Voluntary Retirement Without Statutory Notice Period Under Section 5(3) of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Shri Guru Buddhiswami Mahavidyalaya (the Management), challenged the judgment and order dated 06/12/2013 of the School Tribunal, Latur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...