Search Results for "tenant's ownership"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against Admission of Insolvenc...
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting I...

Search Results for "tenant's ownership"

726 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 726 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Developer Selection in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Tenants of Municipal Corporation Held Ineligible to Vote. The court upheld the selection of developer by General Body Meeting, finding no procedural irregularity in service of notice or conduct of meeting.

25 Jan 2024

The petitioners, claiming to be eligible slum dwellers, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.7 as developer for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Impleadment in Writ Petition Concerning Demolition of Building — Applicant Claims Ownership of Flat and Seeks to Protect Possession. The court held that the applicant has a direct interest in the property and should be heard before any order affecting his rights is passed.

13 Dec 2023

The judgment pertains to an interim application filed by Nagesh Madhava Suvarna seeking impleadment in a pending writ petition. The writ petition was ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Review Order Deleting Possession Finding in Property Dispute. The High Court exceeded its review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC by deleting a finding on possession based on non-framing of issue, which was not an error apparent on the face of the record.

3 Nov 2020

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's order in a review petition that deleted a paragraph from its earlier judgment in a proper...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Benami Transaction Suit — Father-Son Relationship Constitutes Fiduciary Capacity Under Section 4(3)(b) of Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC when exception is pleaded.

2 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the rejection of the plaint by the trial court and the High Court. The appellant, Pawan Kumar, filed a su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute — Deputy Registrar Lacked Jurisdiction to Record Disqualification Under Section 73(1AB) Without Prior Inquiry. The court held that a finding of disqualification under Section 73(1AB) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 cannot be recorded without affording an opportunity of hearing to the affected members.

10 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Vithal Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., challenged an order-cum-show cause notice dated 9.11.2011 issued by the Deputy Registr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Purchaser of Tenanted Agricultural Land Against Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry. Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Purchaser Cannot Claim Rights Without Adjudication Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

30 Jul 2012

The appellant, M/s. S. Kumar Developers and Builders, purchased agricultural land that was tenanted. The appellant obtained mutation entries in the re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Injunction Order in Property Dispute — Defendant's Possession Not Proved, But Balance of Convenience Favors Status Quo. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, as the defendant was in possession and had constructed a structure, and the plaintiff did not produce documentary evidence of title or possession.

13 Oct 2010

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendant, Pandurang Sakharam Patil, challenging the judgment and order dated 3rd December...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Appellants Entitled to Compensation as Successors of Original Encroacher. Court holds that possession and cultivation by predecessor in title, coupled with lack of challenge by Comunidade, establishes entitlement to compensation under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

18 Oct 2005

The case involves a dispute over compensation of Rs.14,33,618 for acquisition of 14,764 sq. metres of land belonging to the Comunidade of Aquem, acqui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Demolition Notice Under MRTP Act — No Tenancy Rights in Unauthorized Structure. Notice under Section 55(1) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 for demolition of unauthorized construction held valid as plaintiff failed to prove lawful tenancy or ownership.

29 Apr 2005

The appellant, Bales Sardara Paracha, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Mumbai seeking a declaration that a notice dated 15th December 2004 issu...

62 63 64 65 66

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)