Search Results for "specific evidence"

12003 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12003 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree Based on Oral Agreement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With in Second Appeal. Oral Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property Proved by Evidence; Written Document Dated 31.12.1973 Did Not Supersede Earlier Oral Agreement.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants challenging concurrent judgments and decrees passed for specific performance of an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 120B IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Ram Baban Shinde and Satish alias Khandya Kashinath Bhalekar, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur in Sessions Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients.

The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Special Court, Khamgaon, convicting the appellants under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.411 OF 2022N

The appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 29.3.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Case No. 368/2021, whereby th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Due to Incriminating Circumstantial Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Together, False Report, and Discovery of Victim's Articles Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 201 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Shivaji Nanasaheb Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, for offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.466 OF 2016

The appeal was filed before the Bombay High Court against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, convicting the appellant under Sect...