Search Results for "separate notices"

1865 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1865 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings — Held That Recovery Officer Has Power to Attach Property Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Zilla Sah Pat Sanstha Ltd. and its Special Recovery Officer, and by Nana Appa Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Disqualification in Tender Process for Construction of Civic Amenities. Petitioner's Bid Disqualified for Non-Submission of Required Documents Despite Having Submitted Them, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, M.S. Constrotech Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the communication dated 28-7-2015 disqualifying its bid in response to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders Under Section 56(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Orders set aside as show cause notices failed to specify the period of proposed externment and the authority did not consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard three criminal writ petitions challenging externment orders passed under Section 56(b) of the Bombay Polic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration — Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Valid as Stay Did Not Cover Acquisition Proceedings

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, owned property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanjur, Mumbai. The property was de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disqualification of Councillors Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act for Defection — No-Confidence Motion Against Mayor Not a 'Split' Under Tenth Schedule Analogous Provisions.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by councillors of the Akola Municipal Corporation challenging their disqualification by the Divisional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Disabled Army Veteran as ITAT Member -- Quashes Compulsory Retirement Finding Mala Fide Actions and Departmental Vendetta -- Upholds SCSC Recommendations in Writ Petition Under Article 32

The Supreme Court allowed a writ petition filed by Captain Pramod Kumar Bajaj against the Union of India and another respondent -- The petitioner, a d...