Search Results for "oral evidence exclusion"

791 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 791 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Retrenchment Dispute. Retrenchment of 12 Liftmen Held Illegal as Management Failed to Prove Abandonment of Service and Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Welcomgroup Searock, which manages the Searock Hotel in Bandra, Mumbai, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 15th Febr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Loan Dispute. Court upholds award holding borrowers jointly and severally liable for Rs.9.88 crore with interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Abid & Company Steels Private Limited and its directors, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Favour of Claimant. Court Holds That Single Judge Erred in Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Quantum and Interest.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Paramount Limited (appellant) against the judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Bills Due to Disputed Facts. Petitioners' challenge to supplementary bills for electricity consumption fails as disputed questions of fact cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, M/s. J.P. Electrical Enterprises and Jai Prakash Rajbali Singh, filed three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Consent Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — No Fraud or Collusion Found in Consent Terms Filed by Counsel. Consent decree upheld as valid and binding under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The petitioners, Dhanaji Kashinath Shendkar and others, filed writ petitions challenging a consent decree passed in a suit for specific performance. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alienations and Direction to Frame Scheme for Charitable Trust. High Court Held Will Dated 27.9.1968 Was Mutual and Joint, and Alienations by Surviving Spouse Void.

These appeals arose from Original Suit No. 76 of 1981, filed by Hindu Community in General and Citizens of Gobichettipalayam as plaintiff, seeking adm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Suit for Coparcenary Property Based on Pre-1956 Female Succession. Widow's acquisition of property under Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 is not a coparcenary asset but her absolute estate under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.08.2019 in O.S. No. 101/2015 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Bagalkot, partl...