Search Results for "developer permission"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "developer permission"

648 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 648 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Agreement Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Development Agreement Held Chargeable Under Article 5(ga) at 1% of Consideration, Not Market Value.

30 Jan 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Prasun Developers, challenged orders of the Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Pune, and the Deputy Inspector Gene...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Arbitration Petition. Court Holds That Cause of Action for Section 9 Petition Arises Where Arbitration Agreement Is Situated, Not Where Interim Relief Is Sought.

1 Feb 2016

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who allowed Chamber Summons No. 905 of 2013 filed by Respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

2 Apr 2026

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC — Held That Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Court Fees Issue Was Curable. The Court restored the suit for trial, emphasizing that the High Court impermissibly conducted a mini-trial at the threshold stage.

21 Apr 2026

The appellant, M/s. Marg Limited, a real estate developer, purchased land in Chennai in 2002 and constructed a commercial IT building. In 2011 and 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Appellate Injunction in Municipal Corporation Land Dispute — Adverse Possession Claim Requires Strong Prima Facie Evidence of Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owner. The court held that a claim of adverse possession against a municipal corporation must be supported by clear evidence of hostile possession and that public interest outweighs private claims in such cases.

27 Apr 2026

The case involves a dispute between the Kolhapur Municipal Corporation (petitioner/defendant) and Dattatraya Vithoba Aatyalkar (respondent/plaintiff) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking DRC in BBMP Land Acquisition Case — Petitioners Failed to Establish Entitlement to Development Rights Certificate Under KTCP Act, 1961.

5 Apr 2022

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Maintainability of Suit Challenging Slum Acquisition Proceedings. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Held Maintainable Despite Bar Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

22 Feb 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against an order dated 12 April 2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Suit No.2862 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes CIDCO Stop-Work Notice in 12.5% Scheme Plot Dispute. Petitioner's Title from Original Owner Upheld Over Trust Claim Under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

8 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Deepak Valji Karia and M/s. Ambedeep Enterprises, challenged a stop-work notice dated 6 May 2016 issued by CIDCO (Respondent Nos. 2-4)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIRs Against Former Chief Minister in BDA Denotification Case — CAG Report Cannot Be Sole Basis for Criminal Prosecution Without Independent Investigation. The court held that the CAG report is not a conclusive proof of criminality and cannot be the foundation for criminal prosecution without independent investigation, and that the FIRs were registered without proper sanction under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Jan 2016

The petitioner, Shri B.S. Yeddyurappa, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.

5 Jun 2017

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...

62 63 64 65

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)