Search Results for "cruelty harassment"

1039 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1039 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dowry Demand and Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of dowry or homicidal death.

The appellant, Vilas Ananda Vandre, was convicted by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, for offences under Sections 498-A, 304-B, and 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Homicidal Death. State fails to prove that deceased died of burns caused by accused or that she was subjected to cruelty for dowry under Sections 498A, 302, 452 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 7th December 1995 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in Ses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Dowry Demand. State's appeal fails as prosecution could not establish that deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry soon before her death under Section 304-B IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five accused persons (respondents) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, in Sessions Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Death Sentence Confirmation in Wife-Murder and Dowry Harassment Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 498A, 506/34 IPC Challenged by Accused Husband and In-Laws; Allegations of Dowry Demand and Murder by Throat-Slitting.

These matters arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Sessions Case No. 182 of 2014, where accused No. 1, Nitin Balkisan Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Compensation Under Domestic Violence Act — Mental Torture and Emotional Distress Constitute Injuries Under Section 22 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Acquittal Under Section 498-A IPC Does Not Bar Civil Remedy Under D.V. Act.

The case involves two criminal writ petitions and connected applications arising from proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Insurance Executive in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Allegations of cruelty under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act fail as no part of cause of action arose within Mumbai where FIR was registered.

The petitioner, Mr. Vijay Choudhary, Vice President – Human Resources at Max New York Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Gurgaon, filed a criminal writ petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove homicidal death and dowry demand beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nanasaheb Changdeo Nikam, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, for offences under Sections 302 and 498-A of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife in Dowry Harassment Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 IPC. Last Seen Theory and Motive Established Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramesh Bhanudas Shelke, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife Savita under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Married Sisters-in-Law and Their Husbands in Dowry Harassment Case — Allegations Found to Be Vague and Constituting Abuse of Process of Law

The applicants, who are the married sisters-in-law of the complainant (respondent No.2) and their respective husbands, filed an application under Sect...