Search Results for "burden under Section 106"

1152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.678 OF 2014

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Dowry Demand. State's appeal fails as prosecution could not establish that deceased was subjected to cruelty or harassment for dowry soon before her death under Section 304-B IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of five accused persons (respondents) by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, in Sessions Cas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The present appeal was filed by Babu Sakharam Dive, Laxman Raoji Dive, and Tryambak Raoji Dive (original accused nos. 1, 2, and 4) challenging the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of four appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Prosecution Case — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt

The appellant, Shrikant Laxman Surwase, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Examines Fee Reimbursement Scheme Restriction for Minority Institution Students. Court Tasked with Resolving Conflicting Precedents on Whether Limiting Reimbursement to CAP-Admitted Students Is Discriminatory.

The case concerned a challenge to a Government Resolution (GR) dated 27.02.2013 issued by the State of Maharashtra, which restricted fee reimbursement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares Payments Made by Company in Liquidation Void Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 and Orders Refund. Payments made after winding up order to caterer without court approval are void, and the caterer must repay with interest.

The Official Liquidator of M/s. GOL Offshore Limited (in liquidation) filed OLR No. 139 of 2018 under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeki...