Search Results for "Single Attempt"

3242 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3242 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Son Convicted of Murdering Mother Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon was complete and consistent with guilt.

The appellant, Suryakant J. Gawde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Panaji, sitting at Ponda, Goa, for the murder of his mother, Smt. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder and Attempt to Murder in Land Dispute Case. The court affirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC for stabbing cousin, while acquitting parents due to lack of evidence of common intention under Section 34 IPC.

The case involves two appeals: one by Deepak @ Anna Sitaram Kate (accused No.1) challenging his conviction for murder and attempt to murder, and anoth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Sanction. Reassessment proceedings initiated without valid approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are invalid.

The petitioner, Vilas Babankrao Kalokhe, challenged a reassessment notice dated 30-03-2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kashinath Shiru Ahire, was a maintenance surveyor in the Land Record office at Sindkheda, District Dhule. He was convicted by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Double Murder Case — Conviction Under Sections 302 and 309 IPC Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Lack of Aggravating Circumstances

The case arises from a tragic incident where the accused, Prakash Vinayakrao Shingnapure, murdered his wife Pranita and 13-year-old daughter Shreya in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Production of Additional Documents in Civil Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach Under CPC Order 13 Rule 1. The Court held that mere delay or suspicion of afterthought is not sufficient to reject documents if no prejudice is caused and cross-examination is ongoing.

The petitioners, defendants in a civil suit for refund of advance of Rs.30 lakhs, filed an application during cross-examination of their witness (DW.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Additional Documents in Civil Suit — Belated Filing to Fill Lacuna Not Permitted. Trial court's discretion to reject application for producing resolution and letter of authority during cross-examination upheld as no justifiable cause shown.

The petitioners, M/s. BGC International Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Balaji Pothraj, were defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 22/2007/A filed by the respondents...