Search Results for "Security Guidelines"

1013 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1013 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Revisional Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perverse. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding legally enforceable debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (Smt. Y.C. Manju) against the revision petitioner (Sunil Yadav) under Section 138 of the Nego...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Dismissal of Employee in Fraudulent Appointment Case — Labour Court's Modification of Punishment Set Aside. Procurement of Employment by False Caste Certificate Constitutes Serious Misconduct Justifying Dismissal Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 11A.

The appellant, Sri Malurappa, was employed by the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC). He was dismissed from service on 27.07.2005 on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute Due to Limitation. Claim Filed Beyond Six-Month Period Under BSE Regulation 252(2) Is Barred.

The petitioner, Kalpana Munish Bumb, was a constituent of respondent no. 1, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange. The last transaction betwee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retail Outlet Dealership Selection for Arbitrary Marking. Court directs reassessment of marks for 'Liquid cash' criterion and fresh selection process.

The petitioner, Shri Pundalik Tukaram Chowgule, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the selection process for a Reta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action in Gadchiroli-Chimur Lok Sabha Constituency Dispute. Alleged Discrepancy of 62 Votes in Final Tally Does Not Constitute a Cause of Action Under Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Dr. Rameshkumar Bapuraoji Gajbe, contested the election to the 17th Lok Sabha from the Gadchiroli-Chimur Constituency as a candidate o...