Search Results for "Maharashtra 2015 Act"

7166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Passport Impounding Orders — Violation of Natural Justice. Impounding under Section 10(3)(e) of Passports Act, 1967 set aside as no show cause notice or hearing was given.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by individuals whose passports were impounded by the Passport Authority under Section 10(3)(e) of the P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Condonation of Delay in Arbitration Matter — Delay of 270 Days Not Sufficiently Explained. Internal administrative procedures do not constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an appeal filed by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer against an order dated 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Transmission Line Over Private Land, Upholds Validity of Section 164 of Electricity Act, 2003. The Court Held That the Provisions for Laying Electricity Lines Without Prior Consent Are Constitutional as They Provide for Hearing and Compensation.

The petitioners, Jarnail Singh and Surinder Singh, are owners of land in Nagpur over which respondent No.1, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Relief Orders in Service Disputes. Held that Industrial Court has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 30(2) of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University and its Vice-Chancellor filed four writ petitions (WP Nos. 2966/2011, 2967/2011, 2968/2011, 2969/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act, 1981 Citing Non-Application of Mind and Procedural Flaws. Detention Based on Stale Past Incidents and Improper Communication of Right to Representation Raises Concerns Under Article 22(5).

The petitioner, a resident of Aurangabad, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the preventive det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010006872022_1

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.261...