Search Results for "Land Use Act"

4663 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4663 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.

The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Sub-Tenant in Rent Control Matter. Sub-tenant with paid-up capital less than Rs 1 crore held entitled to protection under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 despite tenant's exclusion under Section 3(1)(b).

The case involves a dispute over the applicability of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 to a sub-tenant. The applicant, Frick India Ltd, claimed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Preliminary Objections to Jurisdiction in Originating Summons for Interpretation of Trust Deed. Clause 11(v) of the Trust Deed Held Not to Exclude Court's Jurisdiction; Section 80 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act Does Not Bar the Originating Summons.

The judgment arises from an Originating Summons filed by the plaintiff, a permanent trustee of the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust, a public tru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Karnataka Land Reforms Case — Testamentary Succession of Tenancy Rights Upheld. Civil Court Findings on Tenancy and Succession Are Binding on Land Tribunal Under Section 48-A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The case involves a long-standing dispute over agricultural land in Bilagi Village, Karnataka, spanning over half a century. The appellant, Kanna Timm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition by Corporation of the City of Panaji Challenging Compensation Award Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in the Award and Scope of Judicial Review Is Limited.

The petitioner, Corporation of the City of Panaji, challenged an award dated 08.07.2014 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) under Section 48 ...